Reworking and renewal

One thing indecisive people like me find appealing about painting with acrylics is that, unlike with many art media, you don’t ever have to feel you are “stuck” with an outcome. You can always take something you felt was less than wonderful and keep working on it. I suppose this is both a blessing and a curse, as it can lead to a difficulty with moving on. In any case, I had a couple of Primordials done last year that I was never fully satisfied with. Those got a makeover recently and are now ready for sharing with the world.

Primordial V – ©Deidre Adams

Primordial No. 5, 8 x 8 inches, acrylic & mixed media on panel – ©2013 Deidre Adams

 

Adams-Primordial05-IP-

Primordial No. 5, in January 2012

 

Adams-Primordial04-

Primordial No. 4, 8 x 8 inches, acrylic & mixed media on panel – ©2013 Deidre Adams

 

Adams-Primordial04-old-
Primordial No. 4, in January 2012
 

Ironically, there was a third painting I was going to include in this reworking post, but once I put the before and after images together, I decided I still didn’t like it. So back into the mill it goes, until next time.

March 9th, 2013|Painting|2 Comments

Primordial Series

Primordial I –©Deidre AdamsPrimordial No. 1, 8 x 8 inches, acrylic & mixed media on panel – ©2012 Deidre Adams

 

Like a lot of artists, I’m very big on reading. In the past couple of years, I’ve gradually changed from reading fiction to being more interested in books on politics and science. Lately I’ve been reading a lot of articles written for the general public on various science subjects like biology, physics, chemistry, and neuroscience. Some writers have the knack of making science especially interesting and accessible. I’ve really been enjoying the books on the brain by V.S. Ramachandran, a prominent neuroscientist who has contributed important advances in the field by studying people with brain injuries.

All of these readings have been percolating in my mind and have begun to influence my paintings without me really thinking about it too much. I work very abstractly, never trying to make a conscious representation of any one thing. But in a series of small paintings I started last year, I realized that a lot of them have a look of cells or small organisms swimming about in liquid fields.

I decided to call the series Primordial, after the theory of “primordial soup,” first introduced by biologists Alexander Oparin and J.B.S. Haldane in the 1920s. It is one theory of how life came to exist on a planet that was originally just a big ball covered with gases and chemicals.

The theory is summarized as follows:

  1. The early Earth had a chemically reducing atmosphere.
  2. This atmosphere, exposed to energy in various forms, produced simple organic compounds (“monomers“).
  3. These compounds accumulated in a “soup”, which may have been concentrated at various locations (shorelines, oceanic vents etc.).
  4. By further transformation, more complex organic polymers – and ultimately life – developed in the soup.
(From Wikipedia: Primordial Soup)

 

Primordial II – ©Deidre AdamsPrimordial No. 2, 8 x 8 inches, acrylic & mixed media on panel – ©2012 Deidre Adams

 

Of course, nothing in science is ever settled. Now some are challenging the theory and presenting alternate theories. I still like the idea of it, though, so I’m keeping the name.

Primordial V – ©Deidre AdamsPrimordial No. 5, 8 x 8 inches, acrylic & mixed media on panel – ©2012 Deidre Adams

 

Here’s something I struggle with: these paintings are really small, but when I post them large like this, it makes them seem like really big paintings – especially Primordial No. 1 (top). I rather wish I could do this exact same painting at ten times the size. But when I work large, I can’t reproduce the same kinds of marks that I do on the small ones. Something about the energy and dynamics of mark-making is completely changed with scale. It’s something to work on for the future.

February 10th, 2013|Art|4 Comments